The one datasheet distinction that quietly changes which fan you buy.
Two vendors quote a fan at 100 mmWG. One means static pressure; the other means total pressure. Those are not two prices for the same fan — they are two different fans. Three definitions settle it permanently, and one line on your RFQ keeps you from ever comparing them by accident.
Fan static pressure (FSP) excludes the velocity pressure at the fan outlet. Fan total pressure (FTP) includes it. Industrial practice rates fans in static pressure — but a quotation only means something when it says which one it states. At real outlet velocities that gap is nowhere near rounding error. Velocity pressure at standard air density (ρ ≈ 1.2 kg/m³) alone looks like this:
| Outlet velocity | Velocity pressure (Pa) | ≈ mmWG |
|---|---|---|
| 10 m/s | 60 | ~6 |
| 15 m/s | 135 | ~14 |
| 20 m/s | 240 | ~24 |
| 25 m/s | 375 | ~38 |
On that 100 mmWG duty, quoting on FTP instead of FSP quietly moves the fan by 6 to 38 mmWG — set only by how fast the outlet runs. That is enough to land the wrong wheel, the wrong motor, or a fan that reads fine on paper and falls short of its duty on site.
The distinction bites hardest on draft fans. A forced draft (FD) fan pushes ambient air into a furnace or process against positive static; an induced draft (ID) fan pulls hot flue gas out under negative static. The ID fan handles gas that is hotter and far less dense, so both its static and its velocity-pressure numbers shift with temperature and altitude. State the pressure basis and the gas condition together, or the two never reconcile.
A water-filled manometer across the right tappings reads SP, TP, or both — and where the tappings sit changes what the number means. The standard setups differ for a fan with a ducted inlet and outlet, a free inlet with a ducted outlet, and a ducted inlet with a free outlet. That is why a serious test certificate names its method. A credible certificate is run to the IS 4894 / ISO 5801 / AMCA 210 method, with the record stating the exact setup used — no fan carries an AMCA product stamp, so it is the method, not a badge, that you verify. None of this is new: fan builders were publishing static and dynamic water-gauge readings against tip speed as far back as 1916.
Get those four lines right and every quote you receive is finally comparable on the same axis. It is the same discipline behind a clean duty point — see specifying the duty point — and it heads off one of the classic errors in buying an industrial fan. When a buyer sends us a total-pressure schedule, we convert it to fan static and show the conversion, so the basis is never left to guesswork.
Further reading: Specifying the duty point · Seven mistakes buying an industrial fan · Choosing the fan wheel.
Jitamitra Electro Engineering · Fan-engineering notes, written for the engineer.
Sources & basis. Primary source: JEE-MKT-007_Static_Velocity_Total_Pressure_Rev01.docx (Cross-Check CC-009 APPROVED). All definitions (SP acts in all directions / VP kinetic / TP=SP+VP / fan adds total-pressure energy / FSP excludes outlet VP / fans rated in static) and the RFQ four-line checklist are lifted from that doc and its Claims Appendix (Master D2 2.2-2.3, FE-2000). The velocity-pressure table is computed directly from VP=half-rho-v-squared at rho=1.2 kg/m3 (10/15/20/25 m/s -> 60/135/240/375 Pa -> ~6/14/24/38 mmWG at 9.807 Pa/mmWG) — derived from the source formula, no invented figures. Measurement-setup passage from the DOE Sourcebook Fig 2-28 reference; 1916 water-gauge note from the Innes "The Fan" (1916) reference. ID/FD framing added to weave the target SEO terms, consistent with source physics.
Flow, static, gas temperature, application — or attach a spec, GA drawing or a multi-fan schedule. Engineer to engineer.
ISO 9001:2015 quality system · performance-tested to IS 4894 / ISO 5801 / AMCA 210 method · witnessed FAT on request, at no cost.
*For our standard range, additional days required for special projects